كُـنّٰ خَـيّـرَ الخَـلّٰـفِ لِـخَـيّـرِ السَـلّٰـفٰ | 🇸🇦

كُـنّٰ خَـيّـرَ الخَـلّٰـفِ لِـخَـيّـرِ السَـلّٰـفٰ | 🇸🇦

كُـنّٰ خَـيّـرَ الخَـلّٰـفِ لِـخَـيّـرِ السَـلّٰـفٰ | 🇸🇦 Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

"For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events."
كُـنّٰ خَـيّـرَ الخَـلّٰـفِ لِـخَـيّـرِ السَـلّٰـفٰ | 🇸🇦 from us

كُـنّٰ خَـيّـرَ الخَـلّٰـفِ لِـخَـيّـرِ السَـلّٰـفٰ | 🇸🇦البِدَٱيّةٰ: ٢٦/٠٧/٢٠٢٣
« مَن يُرِد الْـلّٰهُ بِهِ خَيـراً يُفَقِّـهُهُ فِي الدِّيـن»

حَرفِيًّا: وكلَّما قرُبَتْ الأخَواتُ،منْ طلبِ العِلْمِ الشَّرعيِّ ونشرِه، نَمَت عُقُولهنّ لِمعرفةِ المَنهَج السّلفيِّ.!
|•يَٱ طَٱلِبٰ العِلّٰمِ لاَ تَبّغِ بِهٰ بَدَلاً

Open Telegram