Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/Agitblog/-26292-26293-): Failed to open stream: No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 АГИТПРОП | Telegram Webview: Agitblog/26292 -
ПС: отменили не из-за проблем с безопасностью, а по политическим соображениям (MSD вывел с рынка все свои продукты, для которых в РФ есть аналоги и оставил только то, где альтернативы нет). Сообщили о своих намерениях они в августе 22 года. Это финальный аккорд.
ПС: отменили не из-за проблем с безопасностью, а по политическим соображениям (MSD вывел с рынка все свои продукты, для которых в РФ есть аналоги и оставил только то, где альтернативы нет). Сообщили о своих намерениях они в августе 22 года. Это финальный аккорд.
In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." "He has kind of an old-school cyber-libertarian world view where technology is there to set you free," Maréchal said.
from jp
