18- In a major cross matching, the following is applied :- a. Donor's cell + patient serum. b. Donor's serum + patient cell. c. Donor's cell donor's serum. d. Patient's cell + patient serum.
جزء المناقشة: 🧐 هذا أيضاً سؤال هدية 😆 في ال major cross matching نحن نهتم بالمريض اكثر والذي سيتلقى الدم لذلك نريد التاكد من عدم وجود اي اجسام مضادة خطيرة في دمه قد تتفاعل مع الانتجينات الموجوده على خلايا دم المتبرع . ستقولون لماذا ليس العكس قد يحتوي دم المتبرع على اجسام مضاده خطيره قد تتفاعل مع كريات دم المتلقي سنقول لكم ان كميه هذه الاجسام المضادة ستكون قليله بالنسبه الى كميه الدم الموجوده في جسد المتلقي وفي اغلب الاحيان يتم نقل كريات الدم الحمراء فقط packed RBCs ويتم التخلص من البلازما وكريات الدم البيضاء لتجنب وقوع ايه مشاكل .
جزء الحل: 🤓 الجواب هو a Donor's cells+ patient's serum . 🫡🫡🫡
18- In a major cross matching, the following is applied :- a. Donor's cell + patient serum. b. Donor's serum + patient cell. c. Donor's cell donor's serum. d. Patient's cell + patient serum.
جزء المناقشة: 🧐 هذا أيضاً سؤال هدية 😆 في ال major cross matching نحن نهتم بالمريض اكثر والذي سيتلقى الدم لذلك نريد التاكد من عدم وجود اي اجسام مضادة خطيرة في دمه قد تتفاعل مع الانتجينات الموجوده على خلايا دم المتبرع . ستقولون لماذا ليس العكس قد يحتوي دم المتبرع على اجسام مضاده خطيره قد تتفاعل مع كريات دم المتلقي سنقول لكم ان كميه هذه الاجسام المضادة ستكون قليله بالنسبه الى كميه الدم الموجوده في جسد المتلقي وفي اغلب الاحيان يتم نقل كريات الدم الحمراء فقط packed RBCs ويتم التخلص من البلازما وكريات الدم البيضاء لتجنب وقوع ايه مشاكل .
جزء الحل: 🤓 الجواب هو a Donor's cells+ patient's serum . 🫡🫡🫡
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Markets continued to grapple with the economic and corporate earnings implications relating to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. “We have a ton of uncertainty right now,” said Stephanie Link, chief investment strategist and portfolio manager at Hightower Advisors. “We’re dealing with a war, we’re dealing with inflation. We don’t know what it means to earnings.” DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation. And while money initially moved into stocks in the morning, capital moved out of safe-haven assets. The price of the 10-year Treasury note fell Friday, sending its yield up to 2% from a March closing low of 1.73%.
from jp
