▫️گفت‌وگو با حمیدرضا محمدی، بنیانگذار #گنجور دربارۀ داستان شکل‌گیری و تکامل این وبگاه
گنجور گونه‌ای خویشکاری فرهنگی است که بی‌صدا اما پیوسته، طی سال‌ها به ثبت، ترویج و تحلیل #ادب_پارسی پرداخته و اکنون به بخشی از حافظه جمعی ایرانیان و فارسی‌زبانان تبدیل شده است؛ مصداق: #تو_یکی_نهی_هزاری_تو_چراغ_خود_برافروز
▫️گفت‌وگو با حمیدرضا محمدی، بنیانگذار #گنجور دربارۀ داستان شکل‌گیری و تکامل این وبگاه
گنجور گونه‌ای خویشکاری فرهنگی است که بی‌صدا اما پیوسته، طی سال‌ها به ثبت، ترویج و تحلیل #ادب_پارسی پرداخته و اکنون به بخشی از حافظه جمعی ایرانیان و فارسی‌زبانان تبدیل شده است؛ مصداق: #تو_یکی_نهی_هزاری_تو_چراغ_خود_برافروز
It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from jp
