Дзержинский районный суд г. Санкт-Петербурга рассмотрел иск Любови Пакулиной к ФГБУК "Государственный Русский музей".
Истец просила признать за ней право собственности на 4 картины авторства ее отца Вячеслава Пакулина: Блокадный Ленинград. Пейзаж с кораблем; На Кировском заводе. Бригада стахановцев; День отдыха на островах; Колхоз. Молотьба. Также истец просила истребовать картины из незаконного владения.
Дзержинский районный суд г. Санкт-Петербурга рассмотрел иск Любови Пакулиной к ФГБУК "Государственный Русский музей".
Истец просила признать за ней право собственности на 4 картины авторства ее отца Вячеслава Пакулина: Блокадный Ленинград. Пейзаж с кораблем; На Кировском заводе. Бригада стахановцев; День отдыха на островах; Колхоз. Молотьба. Также истец просила истребовать картины из незаконного владения.
Суд Пакулиной отказал.
#дзержинский_спб #гражданскиедела #опсспб
BY Объединённая пресс-служба судов Санкт-Петербурга
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." There was another possible development: Reuters also reported that Ukraine said that Belarus could soon join the invasion of Ukraine. However, the AFP, citing a Pentagon official, said the U.S. hasn’t yet seen evidence that Belarusian troops are in Ukraine. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from jp
