В 2024 году на Carnegie Politika вышло много аналитических материалов, которые остаются актуальными даже спустя месяцы после публикации.
В ближайшие недели мы опубликуем серию постов — в каждом будет по 3 материала по важной теме или региону. Ниже в этом посте будут ссылки на всю серии, своего рода оглавление. И чуть заранее — с наступающим Новым годом и Рождеством!
В 2024 году на Carnegie Politika вышло много аналитических материалов, которые остаются актуальными даже спустя месяцы после публикации.
В ближайшие недели мы опубликуем серию постов — в каждом будет по 3 материала по важной теме или региону. Ниже в этом посте будут ссылки на всю серии, своего рода оглавление. И чуть заранее — с наступающим Новым годом и Рождеством!
But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from jp
