Латвия пришла к безоговорочному прибалтийскому успеху. Неизвестные за одну ночь разграбили 15 автобусных остановок на деревяшки, из которых сделаны скамейки. 😂
Похоже на лучший стартап для Европы в преддверии зимы. Надеемся, краска была экологичная, и при сжигании в печи лишних выбросов в свободный латышский воздух не будет.
Латвия пришла к безоговорочному прибалтийскому успеху. Неизвестные за одну ночь разграбили 15 автобусных остановок на деревяшки, из которых сделаны скамейки. 😂
Похоже на лучший стартап для Европы в преддверии зимы. Надеемся, краска была экологичная, и при сжигании в печи лишних выбросов в свободный латышский воздух не будет.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a video message on Tuesday that Ukrainian forces "destroy the invaders wherever we can." "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from jp