С разрешения автора, отдельно публикуем комментарий Д. И. Савельева, относящийся к предыдущему посту и обсуждению под ним. Нам он представляется интересным, поскольку касается поведения А. П. Кулешова в сложившейся вокруг ИППИ ситуации.
С разрешения автора, отдельно публикуем комментарий Д. И. Савельева, относящийся к предыдущему посту и обсуждению под ним. Нам он представляется интересным, поскольку касается поведения А. П. Кулешова в сложившейся вокруг ИППИ ситуации.
Continuing its crackdown against entities allegedly involved in a front-running scam using messaging app Telegram, Sebi on Thursday carried out search and seizure operations at the premises of eight entities in multiple locations across the country. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities. In this regard, Sebi collaborated with the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to reduce the vulnerability of the securities market to manipulation through misuse of mass communication medium like bulk SMS. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children.
from jp
