RT @LIFEprogramme: Europe’s cities are heating up🌡️, but nature can help.
#LIFEProjects @big4lifeproject & LIFE+ A_GreeNet are turning concrete jungles into cool, green spaces with:🌳Urban forests 🏢Green roofs & walls 💧Fountains & lakes
RT @LIFEprogramme: Europe’s cities are heating up🌡️, but nature can help.
#LIFEProjects @big4lifeproject & LIFE+ A_GreeNet are turning concrete jungles into cool, green spaces with:🌳Urban forests 🏢Green roofs & walls 💧Fountains & lakes
But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. He adds: "Telegram has become my primary news source." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements.
from kr
