Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Thanks to Morgoth, I'm thinking back to when I first consciously chose to step out of the system's frame.

It was the mid-1980s when I decided to stop consuming "news", the steady flow of Current Things that even with the primitive technology of the time would set the discourse via radio, television and print.

Why did I stop? What was the point?

Initially, I thought I could handle the bias of the media, which was very clear to me. I knew they were enemies and that they didn't like me or my people. So if they leaned one way on an issue, I could just choose to lean the other way.

But eventually I realized it wasn't that simple. There was another level to the game. The very selection of what issues were in play was in their control. Perhaps more importantly were the things they would never put any attention on. Some things would never be the Current Thing.

Their power to set the frame was not so easy to counteract. How would I find my way to more fundamental issues that they would never talk about while my attention was being swamped every day?

It was a bit of a leap of faith when I stopped. I chose to believe that there was something out there beyond the boundaries of the official frame. And my decision didn't bear immediate fruit. I cast about for a while, trying some more partisan outlets that didn't profess to be "objective news".

But it wasn't really that long before I found myself outside of the options that had been presented to me.

I was no longer consumed by trying to decide between Republicans and Democrats for example. I was happy to recognize both of them as part of a larger system that I rejected.

That simple decision I made in high school to just stop continues to help me be radical, that is, to go to the root to this day.

Let go of being "in the know", of giving your hot take on the issue of the day.

Just stop.



group-telegram.com/RadicalLiberation/2159
Create:
Last Update:

Thanks to Morgoth, I'm thinking back to when I first consciously chose to step out of the system's frame.

It was the mid-1980s when I decided to stop consuming "news", the steady flow of Current Things that even with the primitive technology of the time would set the discourse via radio, television and print.

Why did I stop? What was the point?

Initially, I thought I could handle the bias of the media, which was very clear to me. I knew they were enemies and that they didn't like me or my people. So if they leaned one way on an issue, I could just choose to lean the other way.

But eventually I realized it wasn't that simple. There was another level to the game. The very selection of what issues were in play was in their control. Perhaps more importantly were the things they would never put any attention on. Some things would never be the Current Thing.

Their power to set the frame was not so easy to counteract. How would I find my way to more fundamental issues that they would never talk about while my attention was being swamped every day?

It was a bit of a leap of faith when I stopped. I chose to believe that there was something out there beyond the boundaries of the official frame. And my decision didn't bear immediate fruit. I cast about for a while, trying some more partisan outlets that didn't profess to be "objective news".

But it wasn't really that long before I found myself outside of the options that had been presented to me.

I was no longer consumed by trying to decide between Republicans and Democrats for example. I was happy to recognize both of them as part of a larger system that I rejected.

That simple decision I made in high school to just stop continues to help me be radical, that is, to go to the root to this day.

Let go of being "in the know", of giving your hot take on the issue of the day.

Just stop.

BY Radical Liberation


Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260

Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/RadicalLiberation/2159

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. "Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted. Pavel Durov, Telegram's CEO, is known as "the Russian Mark Zuckerberg," for co-founding VKontakte, which is Russian for "in touch," a Facebook imitator that became the country's most popular social networking site. "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital.
from kr


Telegram Radical Liberation
FROM American