Государство собирается конфисковывать имущество за фейки об армии. Законопроект уже приняли в первом чтении.
«Это не наказание. Мы просто отбираем у наших противников ресурс — в виде имущества и звания, которые используют для враждебной деятельности», — считают эксперты.
Однако под действие законопроекта попадают и военкоры, которые временами критикуют некоторые действия Минобороны. Получается, их поставили под дамоклов меч — и они будут теперь либо писать критику, либо бояться, что их посадят за нее?
Государство собирается конфисковывать имущество за фейки об армии. Законопроект уже приняли в первом чтении.
«Это не наказание. Мы просто отбираем у наших противников ресурс — в виде имущества и звания, которые используют для враждебной деятельности», — считают эксперты.
Однако под действие законопроекта попадают и военкоры, которые временами критикуют некоторые действия Минобороны. Получается, их поставили под дамоклов меч — и они будут теперь либо писать критику, либо бояться, что их посадят за нее?
BY НашПрезидентПУТИН
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Since January 2022, the SC has received a total of 47 complaints and enquiries on illegal investment schemes promoted through Telegram. These fraudulent schemes offer non-existent investment opportunities, promising very attractive and risk-free returns within a short span of time. They commonly offer unrealistic returns of as high as 1,000% within 24 hours or even within a few hours. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from kr
