UK Citizen

UK Citizen

Letter_19_TIME_SENSITVE_United_Nations_General_Assembly_Meeting.docx

Letter 19 – TIME SENSITIVE: United Nation General Assembly Meeting – 20th September 2023.

The UK government (along with governments from around the world) will be meeting on 20th September 2023 in New York City to adopt the Political Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly High-level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response.

MPs either do not understand the implications of this or choose to ignore them. It is, therefore, our job to educate them.

The following template letter has been drafted as if you have written previously to your MP regarding overreach from the World Health Organisation. If this is the first time you are writing, you will need to amend the first paragraph accordingly.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear [Name of MP],

I have written to you previously with respect to the dangers of the World Health Organisation’s WHO CA+ (commonly referred to as the “pandemic treaty”) and the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) both planned to be agreed to in May 2024. Today, I want to draw your attention to a more imminent threat - the Political Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly High-level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response (the “Political Declaration”), which is to be adopted by the UK government in less than 10 days on 20th September 2023 at the 78th General Assembly of the United Nations held in New York City.

I urge you to read, in full, the Political Declaration: https://www.un.org/pga/77/wp-content/uploads/sites/105/2023/06/Zero-draft-PPPR-Political-Declaration-5-June.pdf.

Adoption of the Political Declaration is tantamount to agreeing, now, to both the WHO CA + and the amendments to the IHR (2005).

Let us consider some of the most concerning sections from the Political Declaration (by no means an exhaustive list):

1. The inclusion of PP9 and PP10 of the Political Declaration, which refer to the WHO CA+ and the proposed amendments to the IHR, reaffirms the political commitment of world governments (including the UK) to both legal instruments and raises the question as to whether it is even possible for the UK government to reject either in May 2024 at the 77th World Health Assembly. Is it all a “done deal”?

I suggest that, if you want to understand the dangers of the two international legal instruments, you read my previous email(s) to you on this subject or, better still, read both the Bureau’s Text of the WHO CA+ and the latest draft of the proposed amendments to the IHR (2005) both linked below for your convenience:

a) WHO CA+ Bureau Text: https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb5/A_INB5_6-en.pdf; and

b) Latest draft of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005): https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/WGIHR_Submissions-en.pdf.

2. Contrary to what most MPs have claimed, it is evident from OP44 of the Political Declaration that the WHO CA+ is intended to be a legally binding convention/agreement.

3. One Health, referenced at OP34 and OP35 of the Political Declaration, is a sinister approach that underpins both the WHO CA+ and the proposed amendments to the IHR (2005). The argument put forward, by the WHO, is that the One Health approach (involving collaboration between the WHO, Food and Agriculture Organisation, the United Nations Environmental Program and the World Organisation for Animal Health (together “The Quadripartite”) links people, animals, plants and eco-systems and so improves outcomes not only with respect to pandemics, but for all elements of health - chronic disease, injury, mental health and even non communicable diseases.

www.group-telegram.com/ms/UKcitizen2021.com/1762

2.32K viewsSep 12, 2023 at 20:24

Letter 19 – TIME SENSITIVE: United Nation General Assembly Meeting – 20th September 2023.

The UK government (along with governments from around the world) will be meeting on 20th September 2023 in New York City to adopt the Political Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly High-level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response.

MPs either do not understand the implications of this or choose to ignore them. It is, therefore, our job to educate them.

The following template letter has been drafted as if you have written previously to your MP regarding overreach from the World Health Organisation. If this is the first time you are writing, you will need to amend the first paragraph accordingly.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear [Name of MP],

I have written to you previously with respect to the dangers of the World Health Organisation’s WHO CA+ (commonly referred to as the “pandemic treaty”) and the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) both planned to be agreed to in May 2024. Today, I want to draw your attention to a more imminent threat - the Political Declaration of the United Nations General Assembly High-level Meeting on Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response (the “Political Declaration”), which is to be adopted by the UK government in less than 10 days on 20th September 2023 at the 78th General Assembly of the United Nations held in New York City.

I urge you to read, in full, the Political Declaration: https://www.un.org/pga/77/wp-content/uploads/sites/105/2023/06/Zero-draft-PPPR-Political-Declaration-5-June.pdf.

Adoption of the Political Declaration is tantamount to agreeing, now, to both the WHO CA + and the amendments to the IHR (2005).

Let us consider some of the most concerning sections from the Political Declaration (by no means an exhaustive list):

1. The inclusion of PP9 and PP10 of the Political Declaration, which refer to the WHO CA+ and the proposed amendments to the IHR, reaffirms the political commitment of world governments (including the UK) to both legal instruments and raises the question as to whether it is even possible for the UK government to reject either in May 2024 at the 77th World Health Assembly. Is it all a “done deal”?

I suggest that, if you want to understand the dangers of the two international legal instruments, you read my previous email(s) to you on this subject or, better still, read both the Bureau’s Text of the WHO CA+ and the latest draft of the proposed amendments to the IHR (2005) both linked below for your convenience:

a) WHO CA+ Bureau Text: https://apps.who.int/gb/inb/pdf_files/inb5/A_INB5_6-en.pdf; and

b) Latest draft of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005): https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr1/WGIHR_Submissions-en.pdf.

2. Contrary to what most MPs have claimed, it is evident from OP44 of the Political Declaration that the WHO CA+ is intended to be a legally binding convention/agreement.

3. One Health, referenced at OP34 and OP35 of the Political Declaration, is a sinister approach that underpins both the WHO CA+ and the proposed amendments to the IHR (2005). The argument put forward, by the WHO, is that the One Health approach (involving collaboration between the WHO, Food and Agriculture Organisation, the United Nations Environmental Program and the World Organisation for Animal Health (together “The Quadripartite”) links people, animals, plants and eco-systems and so improves outcomes not only with respect to pandemics, but for all elements of health - chronic disease, injury, mental health and even non communicable diseases.

BY UK Citizen