Ответа пока в принципе нет, более того, появилась некая "завеса тайны" под которой можно спрятать многое.
Так что кроме описанного Мэтром хотелось бы большей прозрачности процесса переговоров, не в похабном смысле, а что бы мы все четко видели: нас в очередной раз "обманывают" или нет, такого допустить точно нельзя. Как всегда не пройдет, ставки слишком велики.
Ответа пока в принципе нет, более того, появилась некая "завеса тайны" под которой можно спрятать многое.
Так что кроме описанного Мэтром хотелось бы большей прозрачности процесса переговоров, не в похабном смысле, а что бы мы все четко видели: нас в очередной раз "обманывают" или нет, такого допустить точно нельзя. Как всегда не пройдет, ставки слишком велики.
BY Что делать?
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. "For Telegram, accountability has always been a problem, which is why it was so popular even before the full-scale war with far-right extremists and terrorists from all over the world," she told AFP from her safe house outside the Ukrainian capital. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from ms
