Это главный вход в Императорский город в Пекине с северной стороны площади Тяньаньмэнь. Там вот-вот начнётся парад в честь 80-летия победы во Второй мировой войне после капитуляции Японии.
Выглядит российский президент под стать вратам — уверенно и спокойно. И это при практически нон-стоп графике.
Это главный вход в Императорский город в Пекине с северной стороны площади Тяньаньмэнь. Там вот-вот начнётся парад в честь 80-летия победы во Второй мировой войне после капитуляции Японии.
Выглядит российский президент под стать вратам — уверенно и спокойно. И это при практически нон-стоп графике.
So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation."
from nl
