Генсек ООН Антониу Гутерреш призвал РФ и Киев пообещать не вести боевых действий в направлении Запорожской АЭС и с территории станции
"В качестве первого шага российские и украинские силы должны взять на себя обязательство не вести никаких военных действий в направлении станции или с территории АЭС. Запорожский объект и его окрестности не должны быть целью или площадкой для военных операций", - сказал Гутерреш на заседании СБ ООН.
Генсек ООН Антониу Гутерреш призвал РФ и Киев пообещать не вести боевых действий в направлении Запорожской АЭС и с территории станции
"В качестве первого шага российские и украинские силы должны взять на себя обязательство не вести никаких военных действий в направлении станции или с территории АЭС. Запорожский объект и его окрестности не должны быть целью или площадкой для военных операций", - сказал Гутерреш на заседании СБ ООН.
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers.
from nl
