🚩 شاید خیلی ها فکر میکردند مجسمه های رضاشاه و پسرش سوار بر اسب در میادین شهرها در دوره پهلوی از ابتکارات رژیم پهلوی بوده است ؟!
در حالیکه تقلیدی از کارهای دوره ناصری در دوره قاجار بوده که رژیم پهلوی با پایین کشیدن مجسمه ناصرالدین شاه قاجار ، مجسمه های خودش را جایگزین و سوار بر اسب ها نمودند ! همین تقلید را هم سلطنت آخوندی پس از سقوط پهلوی یا تخریب کرد و یا بنام خودش کرد .
البته در هیچکدام از این رژیم های مطلقه فردگرا آثار و اسمی از مردم در هنرشان دیده نمیشود.
رژیم ها دزد و غارتگر آمدند و رفتن و میروند ! صاحبان اصلی این مرز بوم مردم این سرزمین و نگاهبان کشور و فرهنگ بزرگشان ، همیشه هستند!
🚩 شاید خیلی ها فکر میکردند مجسمه های رضاشاه و پسرش سوار بر اسب در میادین شهرها در دوره پهلوی از ابتکارات رژیم پهلوی بوده است ؟!
در حالیکه تقلیدی از کارهای دوره ناصری در دوره قاجار بوده که رژیم پهلوی با پایین کشیدن مجسمه ناصرالدین شاه قاجار ، مجسمه های خودش را جایگزین و سوار بر اسب ها نمودند ! همین تقلید را هم سلطنت آخوندی پس از سقوط پهلوی یا تخریب کرد و یا بنام خودش کرد .
البته در هیچکدام از این رژیم های مطلقه فردگرا آثار و اسمی از مردم در هنرشان دیده نمیشود.
رژیم ها دزد و غارتگر آمدند و رفتن و میروند ! صاحبان اصلی این مرز بوم مردم این سرزمین و نگاهبان کشور و فرهنگ بزرگشان ، همیشه هستند!
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. But Telegram says people want to keep their chat history when they get a new phone, and they like having a data backup that will sync their chats across multiple devices. And that is why they let people choose whether they want their messages to be encrypted or not. When not turned on, though, chats are stored on Telegram's services, which are scattered throughout the world. But it has "disclosed 0 bytes of user data to third parties, including governments," Telegram states on its website. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences.
from nl
