وقد درست مع الشيخ #أحمد_السيد ما يزيد على الخمس سنين ولازمت محاضراته وكتبه وأشهد أنه لم يأمرنا إلا بكل خير، ولم يُرشدنا إلا إلى كل برّ، ولم يحذّرنا إلا من كل شر.. وأشهد أني ما وجدتُ في مجالسه غير الهدى والنور والبركة،
وما دعانا إلا لمحبة المسلمين ونصرتهم، وكم حذرنا من التنازع والفُرقة..
وما كلمنا إلا بكتاب الله وبسنة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم..
وقد درست مع الشيخ #أحمد_السيد ما يزيد على الخمس سنين ولازمت محاضراته وكتبه وأشهد أنه لم يأمرنا إلا بكل خير، ولم يُرشدنا إلا إلى كل برّ، ولم يحذّرنا إلا من كل شر.. وأشهد أني ما وجدتُ في مجالسه غير الهدى والنور والبركة،
وما دعانا إلا لمحبة المسلمين ونصرتهم، وكم حذرنا من التنازع والفُرقة..
وما كلمنا إلا بكتاب الله وبسنة رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم..
For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from no
