وفعلاً يتعجّب المرء حينما يرى التكالب على المرجعية من قبل بعضهم ممن لم يثبت اجتهادهم وفقاهتهم أو ثبت وصُرّح بالعدم من قبل أهل الخبرة، على أنه ليس كل ثبوت للاجتهاد يعني الأهلية للمرجعية كما لا يخفى.
والمؤسف أن أولئك يجدون أتباعاً ومقلدين، كما يجدون من يبرر لهم ويدافع عنهم ويهاجم كل أصحاب المواقف من ظاهرة (التمرجع) ويضعهم في دائرة الاتهام بالحسد والعمل وفق المصالح أو غير ذلك ليُخرج موقفهم عن كونه عملاً بالوظيفة الشرعية إلى غيرها!
وفعلاً يتعجّب المرء حينما يرى التكالب على المرجعية من قبل بعضهم ممن لم يثبت اجتهادهم وفقاهتهم أو ثبت وصُرّح بالعدم من قبل أهل الخبرة، على أنه ليس كل ثبوت للاجتهاد يعني الأهلية للمرجعية كما لا يخفى.
والمؤسف أن أولئك يجدون أتباعاً ومقلدين، كما يجدون من يبرر لهم ويدافع عنهم ويهاجم كل أصحاب المواقف من ظاهرة (التمرجع) ويضعهم في دائرة الاتهام بالحسد والعمل وفق المصالح أو غير ذلك ليُخرج موقفهم عن كونه عملاً بالوظيفة الشرعية إلى غيرها!
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." Andrey, a Russian entrepreneur living in Brazil who, fearing retaliation, asked that NPR not use his last name, said Telegram has become one of the few places Russians can access independent news about the war. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information.
from pl
