"Умом Россию не понять". Сделал ролик для друзей иностранцев, которые все время задают вопросы — а что такое Россия. Последние 4 месяца ездил по России, снимал.
Ну ладно, ладно. Я пошутил. Это я все сгенерил, как обычно. Реальных кадров тут нет. Смотреть, конечно, со звуком.
"Умом Россию не понять". Сделал ролик для друзей иностранцев, которые все время задают вопросы — а что такое Россия. Последние 4 месяца ездил по России, снимал.
Ну ладно, ладно. Я пошутил. Это я все сгенерил, как обычно. Реальных кадров тут нет. Смотреть, конечно, со звуком.
BY Нейронутые | ИИ (Егор Апполонов)
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from pl
