🔯 #AAVE #USDC #биржи Аналитик блокчейна Юй Цзинь (Lookonchain): osushidaisuki.ethпродал7873,7 AAVE за 2 475 000 USDC, получив прибыль в $1,73 млн (+234%). Ранее 12 августа он вывел 7740,5 AAVE ($0,74 млн) с Bybit, когда цена AAVE составляла $95,7
🔯 #AAVE #USDC #биржи Аналитик блокчейна Юй Цзинь (Lookonchain): osushidaisuki.ethпродал7873,7 AAVE за 2 475 000 USDC, получив прибыль в $1,73 млн (+234%). Ранее 12 августа он вывел 7740,5 AAVE ($0,74 млн) с Bybit, когда цена AAVE составляла $95,7
BY Cryptovka | Новости Крипторынка и Блокчейна
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from ru
