إن الصلاة المؤداة بصفتها الكاملة تنهى صاحبها عن الوقوع في المعاصي والمنكرات لما تحدثه من نور في القلوب يمنع من اقتراف المعاصي، ويرشد إلى عمل الصالحات، ولذكر الله أكبر وأعظم من كل شيء والله يعلم ما تصنعونه لا يخفى عليه من أعمالكم شيء وسيجازيكم على أعمالكم إن خيرًا فخير وإن شرًّا فشر
إن الصلاة المؤداة بصفتها الكاملة تنهى صاحبها عن الوقوع في المعاصي والمنكرات لما تحدثه من نور في القلوب يمنع من اقتراف المعاصي، ويرشد إلى عمل الصالحات، ولذكر الله أكبر وأعظم من كل شيء والله يعلم ما تصنعونه لا يخفى عليه من أعمالكم شيء وسيجازيكم على أعمالكم إن خيرًا فخير وإن شرًّا فشر
BY أَواب.
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Pavel Durov, Telegram's CEO, is known as "the Russian Mark Zuckerberg," for co-founding VKontakte, which is Russian for "in touch," a Facebook imitator that became the country's most popular social networking site. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from ru
