Обожаю смелые бренды! Побывала в концепт-сторе парфюмерного бренда BORNTOSTANDOUT в Сеуле, если коротко — ВАУ было!
В ДНК бренда бунт против стандартов, думаю фраза who fuckin’ care тут всё за себя говорит)) и конечно флаконы на веревках супер решение, посмотрите ролик!
Обожаю смелые бренды! Побывала в концепт-сторе парфюмерного бренда BORNTOSTANDOUT в Сеуле, если коротко — ВАУ было!
В ДНК бренда бунт против стандартов, думаю фраза who fuckin’ care тут всё за себя говорит)) и конечно флаконы на веревках супер решение, посмотрите ролик!
Update March 8, 2022: EFF has clarified that Channels and Groups are not fully encrypted, end-to-end, updated our post to link to Telegram’s FAQ for Cloud and Secret chats, updated to clarify that auto-delete is available for group and channel admins, and added some additional links. On Telegram’s website, it says that Pavel Durov “supports Telegram financially and ideologically while Nikolai (Duvov)’s input is technological.” Currently, the Telegram team is based in Dubai, having moved around from Berlin, London and Singapore after departing Russia. Meanwhile, the company which owns Telegram is registered in the British Virgin Islands. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from sa
