أمَا والواقع في غزتنا هكذا، فليس أمام أهل الثغور سوى الإثخان في أعداء الله. وليفهم العدو أن وجوده مكلف وله أثمان. ويقيموا الحُجَّة على كل قادر قاعد عن نصرة غ زة في مظلمتها الطويلة، وغربتها الأليمة، ويُتمها الحزين. اللهم احفظ وسدِّد عبادك الذين يقاتلون في سبيلك. وحسبنا الله ونعم الوكيل.
أمَا والواقع في غزتنا هكذا، فليس أمام أهل الثغور سوى الإثخان في أعداء الله. وليفهم العدو أن وجوده مكلف وله أثمان. ويقيموا الحُجَّة على كل قادر قاعد عن نصرة غ زة في مظلمتها الطويلة، وغربتها الأليمة، ويُتمها الحزين. اللهم احفظ وسدِّد عبادك الذين يقاتلون في سبيلك. وحسبنا الله ونعم الوكيل.
BY سامي بن جبر إشتيوي
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram does offer end-to-end encrypted communications through Secret Chats, but this is not the default setting. Standard conversations use the MTProto method, enabling server-client encryption but with them stored on the server for ease-of-access. This makes using Telegram across multiple devices simple, but also means that the regular Telegram chats you’re having with folks are not as secure as you may believe. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. In December 2021, Sebi officials had conducted a search and seizure operation at the premises of certain persons carrying out similar manipulative activities through Telegram channels. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
