When I see that a person isn't happy with their audience for incredibly good reasons, I, as a follower, don't judge them at all, but understand them. Plus, I realise it's not about me, I'm an active follower and support those whose work I like. I'm not stupid, unlike those who take it personally. And they take it personally for a reason, they just know that's who they are - haters, complainers and price-dumpers. Some are thieves or their supporters.
Furthermore, if I see a vile audience for another person, I absolutely support that person and agree with them that they are unlucky with their audience. But the bastards who are not good follower and are insulted, they usually never support the author or the content, they are rotten, not follower and they realise it themselves. Those are the kind of crap bipedals I will ban, leaving only those who are positive towards me. I don't need other creatures' shit, and I'm not going to share my creativity and content with shit. Only with good people, of which there are few.
When I see that a person isn't happy with their audience for incredibly good reasons, I, as a follower, don't judge them at all, but understand them. Plus, I realise it's not about me, I'm an active follower and support those whose work I like. I'm not stupid, unlike those who take it personally. And they take it personally for a reason, they just know that's who they are - haters, complainers and price-dumpers. Some are thieves or their supporters.
Furthermore, if I see a vile audience for another person, I absolutely support that person and agree with them that they are unlucky with their audience. But the bastards who are not good follower and are insulted, they usually never support the author or the content, they are rotten, not follower and they realise it themselves. Those are the kind of crap bipedals I will ban, leaving only those who are positive towards me. I don't need other creatures' shit, and I'm not going to share my creativity and content with shit. Only with good people, of which there are few.
BY Servaldays
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. However, the perpetrators of such frauds are now adopting new methods and technologies to defraud the investors. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from us
