Челябинский клуб «Трактор» вышел на рынок батареек
Батарейки выпускаются в двух форматах – «пальчиковом» (АА) и «мизинчиковом» (ААА) с символикой клуба. В команде уверены, что эти источники питания смогут зарядить электронные устройства болельщиков на победу.
Помимо батареек, клуб выпускает брендированные сувениры, одежду, рюкзаки, шайбы, средства гигиены и аксессуары.
Челябинский клуб «Трактор» вышел на рынок батареек
Батарейки выпускаются в двух форматах – «пальчиковом» (АА) и «мизинчиковом» (ААА) с символикой клуба. В команде уверены, что эти источники питания смогут зарядить электронные устройства болельщиков на победу.
Помимо батареек, клуб выпускает брендированные сувениры, одежду, рюкзаки, шайбы, средства гигиены и аксессуары.
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Anastasia Vlasova/Getty Images If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from sg
