Позиционные боевые действия в районе Красногоровки. ВС РФ смогли продвинуться более 3км и занять новые позиции в восточной части посёлка Зоряное подтверждая контроль территорий ВС РФ на участке западнее Невельского. Передовая позиция ВС РФ в жилой застройке под огнём со стороны ВСУ.
Позиционные боевые действия в районе Красногоровки. ВС РФ смогли продвинуться более 3км и занять новые позиции в восточной части посёлка Зоряное подтверждая контроль территорий ВС РФ на участке западнее Невельского. Передовая позиция ВС РФ в жилой застройке под огнём со стороны ВСУ.
Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from sg
