Telegram Group & Telegram Channel
Russian invasion of Latvia. Mission (im)possible

The Americans have written a lengthy article on the possible Russian invasion of Latvia. Interestingly, this is not the work of some amateur writers – the author of the publication is the Jamestown Foundation, an American think tank founded in 1984 to study threats from authoritarian regimes. This organisation specialises in analysing Russia, China, Iran, as well as terrorism and hybrid warfare. Its reports are read at the Pentagon, NATO and among intelligence officers.

The foundation is often the first to expose the Kremlin's military plans, which is why it is the target of Russian propaganda. For Moscow, it is "intelligence under the guise of analysis."

Here is the full article:

"Russia is exploiting Latvia's vulnerability to undermine the defence of the Baltic states

Russia is secretly deploying new motorised rifle divisions and modern artillery systems, including North Korean equipment, in regions near Latvia, forming a strategic reserve that is almost invisible to the public.

Belarus is becoming an operational flank bastion thanks to mobilisation, infrastructure modernisation near the border with Latvia and large-scale exercises simulating offensive manoeuvres, indicating close coordination with Russian strategic plans.

Infrastructure development in north-western Russia, including the modernisation of railways and depots, indicates preparations for a possible rapid invasion of Latvia.

The likely direction of the offensive will bypass strongholds in Latvia to reach logistics hubs, disconnect North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) defence forces and isolate Riga, potentially allowing Russia to gain a foothold in the Baltic region.

Drawing on its experience in Ukraine, Russia could employ "pulsed offensive tactics" using mobile units, electronic warfare and psychological operations to paralyse command structures and force a destabilising truce that recognises new territorial realities.

Over the past two years, there have been worrying structural changes in Russia's armed forces, especially in areas adjacent to Latvia. The deployment of entirely new motorised rifle divisions, including the 116th, 72nd, 74th and 86th motorised rifle divisions (guards), has begun in the Leningrad Military District and Belarus, which has not been reported in official communiqués. Their coordination, redeployment and re-equipment are taking place without the attention of the West, which may indicate that they are intended for another, alternative campaign.

At the same time, Russian convoys carrying the latest artillery systems and multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS), including self-propelled Malva howitzers and North Korean-made equipment, are being observed passing through Petrozavodsk, Pskov, Tikhvin and Gatchina in Russia, but are not reaching the front lines in Ukraine. This indicates the formation of a deep strategic reserve, either to suppress potential internal unrest or for a new theatre of operations.

The logistics of these echelons are carefully coordinated. Many platforms are covered with tarpaulins, and accompanying units restrict civilian access to platforms and stations. This indirectly confirms that this is not a rotation but a deliberate redeployment

Belarus, in this configuration, acts as an operational flank bastion. In 2024–2025, it intensified the formation of expanded divisional structures based on brigades and mobilised many reservists under the pretext of territorial defence. Soviet weapons depots that had not been used for decades were restored.

In the western part of the country (Glybokoe, Polatsk, Braslav), engineering work is intensifying, including the modernisation of motorways and bridges leading to the border with Latvia. This is an important sign – if we follow the methodology of Soviet military strategist Alexander Svechin and the Soviet General Staff – it is preparation for an offensive operation in its hidden stage.
👇



group-telegram.com/gistapapapa/109533
Create:
Last Update:

Russian invasion of Latvia. Mission (im)possible

The Americans have written a lengthy article on the possible Russian invasion of Latvia. Interestingly, this is not the work of some amateur writers – the author of the publication is the Jamestown Foundation, an American think tank founded in 1984 to study threats from authoritarian regimes. This organisation specialises in analysing Russia, China, Iran, as well as terrorism and hybrid warfare. Its reports are read at the Pentagon, NATO and among intelligence officers.

The foundation is often the first to expose the Kremlin's military plans, which is why it is the target of Russian propaganda. For Moscow, it is "intelligence under the guise of analysis."

Here is the full article:

"Russia is exploiting Latvia's vulnerability to undermine the defence of the Baltic states

Russia is secretly deploying new motorised rifle divisions and modern artillery systems, including North Korean equipment, in regions near Latvia, forming a strategic reserve that is almost invisible to the public.

Belarus is becoming an operational flank bastion thanks to mobilisation, infrastructure modernisation near the border with Latvia and large-scale exercises simulating offensive manoeuvres, indicating close coordination with Russian strategic plans.

Infrastructure development in north-western Russia, including the modernisation of railways and depots, indicates preparations for a possible rapid invasion of Latvia.

The likely direction of the offensive will bypass strongholds in Latvia to reach logistics hubs, disconnect North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) defence forces and isolate Riga, potentially allowing Russia to gain a foothold in the Baltic region.

Drawing on its experience in Ukraine, Russia could employ "pulsed offensive tactics" using mobile units, electronic warfare and psychological operations to paralyse command structures and force a destabilising truce that recognises new territorial realities.

Over the past two years, there have been worrying structural changes in Russia's armed forces, especially in areas adjacent to Latvia. The deployment of entirely new motorised rifle divisions, including the 116th, 72nd, 74th and 86th motorised rifle divisions (guards), has begun in the Leningrad Military District and Belarus, which has not been reported in official communiqués. Their coordination, redeployment and re-equipment are taking place without the attention of the West, which may indicate that they are intended for another, alternative campaign.

At the same time, Russian convoys carrying the latest artillery systems and multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS), including self-propelled Malva howitzers and North Korean-made equipment, are being observed passing through Petrozavodsk, Pskov, Tikhvin and Gatchina in Russia, but are not reaching the front lines in Ukraine. This indicates the formation of a deep strategic reserve, either to suppress potential internal unrest or for a new theatre of operations.

The logistics of these echelons are carefully coordinated. Many platforms are covered with tarpaulins, and accompanying units restrict civilian access to platforms and stations. This indirectly confirms that this is not a rotation but a deliberate redeployment

Belarus, in this configuration, acts as an operational flank bastion. In 2024–2025, it intensified the formation of expanded divisional structures based on brigades and mobilised many reservists under the pretext of territorial defence. Soviet weapons depots that had not been used for decades were restored.

In the western part of the country (Glybokoe, Polatsk, Braslav), engineering work is intensifying, including the modernisation of motorways and bridges leading to the border with Latvia. This is an important sign – if we follow the methodology of Soviet military strategist Alexander Svechin and the Soviet General Staff – it is preparation for an offensive operation in its hidden stage.
👇

BY Фашик Донецький





Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/gistapapapa/109533

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. Some people used the platform to organize ahead of the storming of the U.S. Capitol in January 2021, and last month Senator Mark Warner sent a letter to Durov urging him to curb Russian information operations on Telegram. And indeed, volatility has been a hallmark of the market environment so far in 2022, with the S&P 500 still down more than 10% for the year-to-date after first sliding into a correction last month. The CBOE Volatility Index, or VIX, has held at a lofty level of more than 30. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from sg


Telegram Фашик Донецький
FROM American