Бывший председатель комиссии https://www.group-telegram.com/porno_politika/35113 Общественной палаты Новосибирска, владелец ООО "Атлас" Михаил Обласов и его бизнес-партнер Николай Вдовин арестованы по делу о мошенничестве. Предприниматели получили от мэрии Новосибирска земельный участок под предлогом создания садового товарищества, но позже его перепродали. Ущерб бюджету оценивается в 383 млн руб. https://www.group-telegram.com/porno_politika
Бывший председатель комиссии https://www.group-telegram.com/porno_politika/35113 Общественной палаты Новосибирска, владелец ООО "Атлас" Михаил Обласов и его бизнес-партнер Николай Вдовин арестованы по делу о мошенничестве. Предприниматели получили от мэрии Новосибирска земельный участок под предлогом создания садового товарищества, но позже его перепродали. Ущерб бюджету оценивается в 383 млн руб. https://www.group-telegram.com/porno_politika
BY Типичные политики
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from sg
