سنسعى باستمرار أيضاً في تطوير القدرات العسكرية بإذن الله تعالى، وبالاعتماد عليه، وعلى توفيقه، وتسديده، ومعونته، من أجل أداءٍ أقوى، وأعظم، وأكثر فاعليةً في إسناد الشعب الفلسطيني، وهذا بالنسبة لنا هو مسار مستمر نستمر عليه بإذن الله تعالى. #سيد_القول_والفعل🌺🇾🇪 #معركة_الفتح_الموعود_والجهاد_المقدس🇾🇪
سنسعى باستمرار أيضاً في تطوير القدرات العسكرية بإذن الله تعالى، وبالاعتماد عليه، وعلى توفيقه، وتسديده، ومعونته، من أجل أداءٍ أقوى، وأعظم، وأكثر فاعليةً في إسناد الشعب الفلسطيني، وهذا بالنسبة لنا هو مسار مستمر نستمر عليه بإذن الله تعالى. #سيد_القول_والفعل🌺🇾🇪 #معركة_الفتح_الموعود_والجهاد_المقدس🇾🇪
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war.
from tr
