Часто для того, чтобы моделировать мрачное будущее, бывает полезно заглядывать в не очень доброе прошлое. Идеи для тех, кто себе создает образ для Пустоши, особенно связанные с огненными делами. В 30-е годы XX столетия что пожарные, что огнеметчики выглядели очень нарядно. Вот таким образом выглядели шлемы пожарных (первые два) и французских огнеметчиков. Как идейное вдохновение подходят отлично. #cosplay@afterusevents #fact@afterusevents #fallout
Часто для того, чтобы моделировать мрачное будущее, бывает полезно заглядывать в не очень доброе прошлое. Идеи для тех, кто себе создает образ для Пустоши, особенно связанные с огненными делами. В 30-е годы XX столетия что пожарные, что огнеметчики выглядели очень нарядно. Вот таким образом выглядели шлемы пожарных (первые два) и французских огнеметчиков. Как идейное вдохновение подходят отлично. #cosplay@afterusevents #fact@afterusevents #fallout
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. The original Telegram channel has expanded into a web of accounts for different locations, including specific pages made for individual Russian cities. There's also an English-language website, which states it is owned by the people who run the Telegram channels. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee.
from tr
