Новый политический статус Медведева вкупе с «Эпохой СВО» требуют как раз передачи на его плечи функций идеологического медиатора. Медведев, в широком понимании, тот самый легализованный, системный «атлант», который должен держать на своих плечах скрепы и идеологемы глубинного народа. Более того, Кремль возложил на него роль «глашатая», который сигнализирует внутренним и внешним игрокам о настроениях и намерениях политической элиты. Другого кандидата на эту роль нет.
Новый политический статус Медведева вкупе с «Эпохой СВО» требуют как раз передачи на его плечи функций идеологического медиатора. Медведев, в широком понимании, тот самый легализованный, системный «атлант», который должен держать на своих плечах скрепы и идеологемы глубинного народа. Более того, Кремль возложил на него роль «глашатая», который сигнализирует внутренним и внешним игрокам о настроениях и намерениях политической элиты. Другого кандидата на эту роль нет.
BY Тот самый политолог Туманян
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has been a driving force in markets for the past few weeks. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from tw
