Warning: mkdir(): No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 37

Warning: file_put_contents(aCache/aDaily/post/SNIDC/--): Failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
🔷️👊نافرمانی مدنی ایرانیان👊🔷️ | Telegram Webview: SNIDC/85845 -
Telegram Group & Telegram Channel



group-telegram.com/SNIDC/85845
Create:
Last Update:

🌞اتحادیه پادشاهی خواهان🌞

۳ آذر ماه ۲۵۸۴شاهنشاهی


♻️کانال های اتحادیه:

تلگرام رسمی رضا شاه دوم

کانال پیکان ایرانشهر

کانال نافرمانیهای مدنی ایران

کانال جنبش فرزندان ایران

کانال کوروش رادمنش

کانال ایرانشهر

کانال پادشاهی پارلمانی

کانال جنبش شهیاران rp

کانال بسوی آزادی

کانال دمکراتیک پادشاهی پارلمانی

کانال روشنگران مزدور ستیز

کانال سامانه پادشاهی پارلمانی

کانال جامعه سکولار دموکرات

کانال پندهای شاهنامه

کانال پیام بشریت

کانال فرزندان کوروش

کانال اتاق خبر ایران

کانال روزنامه فارسی

کانال همبستگی ایران

کانال رستاخیز ملی

کانال گارد مجازی

BY 🔷️👊نافرمانی مدنی ایرانیان👊🔷️




Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/SNIDC/85845

View MORE
Open in Telegram


Telegram | DID YOU KNOW?

Date: |

The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. For tech stocks, “the main thing is yields,” Essaye said. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from tw


Telegram 🔷️👊نافرمانی مدنی ایرانیان👊🔷️
FROM American