Крымского художника, который облил здание администрации Евпатории сине-желтой краской, приговорили к 15 годам лишения свободы.
Антивоенную акцию 28-летний художник Богдан Зиза провел в мае прошлого года. Мужчина облил здание администрации краской, а также, по данным следствия, поджег фасад коктейлем Молотова.
Спустя неделю Богдана задержали по обвинениям в оправдании терроризма (205.2 УК), подготовке к теракту (205 УК) и вандализме (214 УК). Сегодня военный суд Ростова-на-Дону вынес обвинительный приговор. Мужчине дали 15 лет колонии, первые четыре из них он проведет в тюрьме. Обвинение запрашивало 18 лет лишения свободы.
Крымского художника, который облил здание администрации Евпатории сине-желтой краской, приговорили к 15 годам лишения свободы.
Антивоенную акцию 28-летний художник Богдан Зиза провел в мае прошлого года. Мужчина облил здание администрации краской, а также, по данным следствия, поджег фасад коктейлем Молотова.
Спустя неделю Богдана задержали по обвинениям в оправдании терроризма (205.2 УК), подготовке к теракту (205 УК) и вандализме (214 УК). Сегодня военный суд Ростова-на-Дону вынес обвинительный приговор. Мужчине дали 15 лет колонии, первые четыре из них он проведет в тюрьме. Обвинение запрашивало 18 лет лишения свободы.
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects.
from tw
