Nansen | the most powerful multichain AI analytics platform, a new way to win.
How to farm points retroactive on Nansen AI ? ➡️Stake or Delegate: http://stake.nansen.ai Use Nansen Validators for staking tokens $ATOM, $TIA, $OSMO, $HYPE, $SOL, $SUI, $BAND, or etc.
➡️Nansen Dashboard ➖ Go to https://app.nansen.ai ➖ Add your email and connect Telegram in Settings ➖ Create portfolio and use other options in their app
Nansen | the most powerful multichain AI analytics platform, a new way to win.
How to farm points retroactive on Nansen AI ? ➡️Stake or Delegate: http://stake.nansen.ai Use Nansen Validators for staking tokens $ATOM, $TIA, $OSMO, $HYPE, $SOL, $SUI, $BAND, or etc.
➡️Nansen Dashboard ➖ Go to https://app.nansen.ai ➖ Add your email and connect Telegram in Settings ➖ Create portfolio and use other options in their app
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from us
