Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 9881 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 ГРИГОРЬЕВ | Telegram Webview: maximgrigoryev/3724 -
Книга М.С. Григорьева, Д.В. Саблина «Украинские преступления против человечности (2022-2023)».
В книге представлены доказательства украинских преступлений, собранные Международным общественным трибуналом по преступлениям украинских неонацистов и их пособников.
Книга М.С. Григорьева, Д.В. Саблина «Украинские преступления против человечности (2022-2023)».
В книге представлены доказательства украинских преступлений, собранные Международным общественным трибуналом по преступлениям украинских неонацистов и их пособников.
"We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. "Russians are really disconnected from the reality of what happening to their country," Andrey said. "So Telegram has become essential for understanding what's going on to the Russian-speaking world." Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from us
