Накануне сайт попал в реестр запрещенных интернет-ресурсов. Инициатором внесудебной блокировки выступила Генпрокуратура. Как следует из реестра, сайт заблокирован за «информацию с призывами к массовым беспорядкам и осуществлению экстремистской деятельности».
Портал «Государственная Дума VIII созыва» был посвящен кандидатам в ГД, участвующим в нынешней избирательной кампании. Он должен был стать аналогом проекта команды Алексея Навального «Умное голосование», но не получил популярности даже среди оппозиционно настроенных россиян.
Накануне сайт попал в реестр запрещенных интернет-ресурсов. Инициатором внесудебной блокировки выступила Генпрокуратура. Как следует из реестра, сайт заблокирован за «информацию с призывами к массовым беспорядкам и осуществлению экстремистской деятельности».
Портал «Государственная Дума VIII созыва» был посвящен кандидатам в ГД, участвующим в нынешней избирательной кампании. Он должен был стать аналогом проекта команды Алексея Навального «Умное голосование», но не получил популярности даже среди оппозиционно настроенных россиян.
"There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives?
from us
