📌 Freud argued—and this is why his thought was scandalous when it was first propagated in turn-of-the-century vienna—that sexuality was pervasive in human life and that attempt to abolish it or censor it resulted in perverse and bizarre forms of sexuality. So sexuality was not something that only appeared in grown-up people. It was there when an infant was born of us all the way through and you couldn't repress it. My view of religion is similar to Freud's view of sex. Religion is as ubiquitous in the human animal as sexuality is. An attempt to surpass it, transcend it, leave it behind or worse still prohibited or ban it or censor it have the same results that Freud said repression of sexuality and that's the state comes out in bizarre hysterical hidden or obscure forms. John Gray📌 فروید استدلال می‌کرد — و به همین دلیل افکارش در وینِ اواخر قرن نوزدهم و اوایل قرن بیستم رسوایی‌برانگیز بود — که میل جنسی در زندگی انسان همه‌گیر است و تلاش برای سرکوب یا سانسور آن، به شکل‌های منحرف و عجیبِ جنسی می‌انجامد. بنابراین، سکسوالیته چیزی نبود که صرفاً در بزرگسالان ظهور کند؛ از لحظه‌ی تولد نوزاد در ما وجود دارد و نمی‌توان آن را سرکوب کرد. نگاه من به دین، شبیه نگاه فروید به سکسوالیته است. دین نیز در انسان، به عنوان موجودی زنده، به همان اندازه‌ی میل جنسی فراگیر است. تلاش برای فراتر رفتن از آن، عبور از آن، کنار گذاشتن‌اش، یا حتی بدتر از آن: ممنوعیت، تحریم و سانسور آن، همان نتایجی را دارد که فروید در مورد سرکوب جنسیت بیان کرد: این امور به شکل‌های پنهان، نامتعارف، یا آشفته‌ای بروز می‌یابند. جان گری (ترجمه با دستیاری هوش مصنوعی و اندکی ویرایش) @YMirdamadi
📌 Freud argued—and this is why his thought was scandalous when it was first propagated in turn-of-the-century vienna—that sexuality was pervasive in human life and that attempt to abolish it or censor it resulted in perverse and bizarre forms of sexuality. So sexuality was not something that only appeared in grown-up people. It was there when an infant was born of us all the way through and you couldn't repress it. My view of religion is similar to Freud's view of sex. Religion is as ubiquitous in the human animal as sexuality is. An attempt to surpass it, transcend it, leave it behind or worse still prohibited or ban it or censor it have the same results that Freud said repression of sexuality and that's the state comes out in bizarre hysterical hidden or obscure forms. John Gray📌 فروید استدلال می‌کرد — و به همین دلیل افکارش در وینِ اواخر قرن نوزدهم و اوایل قرن بیستم رسوایی‌برانگیز بود — که میل جنسی در زندگی انسان همه‌گیر است و تلاش برای سرکوب یا سانسور آن، به شکل‌های منحرف و عجیبِ جنسی می‌انجامد. بنابراین، سکسوالیته چیزی نبود که صرفاً در بزرگسالان ظهور کند؛ از لحظه‌ی تولد نوزاد در ما وجود دارد و نمی‌توان آن را سرکوب کرد. نگاه من به دین، شبیه نگاه فروید به سکسوالیته است. دین نیز در انسان، به عنوان موجودی زنده، به همان اندازه‌ی میل جنسی فراگیر است. تلاش برای فراتر رفتن از آن، عبور از آن، کنار گذاشتن‌اش، یا حتی بدتر از آن: ممنوعیت، تحریم و سانسور آن، همان نتایجی را دارد که فروید در مورد سرکوب جنسیت بیان کرد: این امور به شکل‌های پنهان، نامتعارف، یا آشفته‌ای بروز می‌یابند. جان گری (ترجمه با دستیاری هوش مصنوعی و اندکی ویرایش) @YMirdamadi
BY تاریخ فرهنگی و جهان اسلام: تفکر استراتژیک (His.myth.theo) middle east studies
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. In view of this, the regulator has cautioned investors not to rely on such investment tips / advice received through social media platforms. It has also said investors should exercise utmost caution while taking investment decisions while dealing in the securities market. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. On Telegram’s website, it says that Pavel Durov “supports Telegram financially and ideologically while Nikolai (Duvov)’s input is technological.” Currently, the Telegram team is based in Dubai, having moved around from Berlin, London and Singapore after departing Russia. Meanwhile, the company which owns Telegram is registered in the British Virgin Islands.
from vn
