Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
MODEL ESSAY
Sherlock Holmes, arguably the most popular fictional detective, was able to identify a person’s true nature simply by watching them walk or hold a conversation. We ordinary folk are far from ever being able to emulate such feats, but something that is generally believed to be feasible is to learn a person’s background and personality based solely on their outfit. While I agree that a lot can be shown by the clothes that a person wears, I also think that this information is not sufficient to paint a complete picture of a person’s identity, and, therefore, we should not rely on it to judge others.
On the one hand, I can see why people believe that there is a connection between clothes and identity. One can argue that a person’s traits and values often manifest themselves in the colour and type of clothes that they tend to choose, which can be backed up by a vast amount of anecdotal evidence. We can safely assume that a shy person, who would want to shield themselves from a public eye, would choose more modest garments in pale colours so as not to attract any unnecessary attention. Meanwhile, bright colours and a more revealing outfit may suggest higher levels of confidence and willingness to engage in interactions with other people.
With the cultural background, the link becomes even more definite. Traditional clothes can help, with some acceptable degree of inaccuracy, indicate the country of origin and, more importantly, the cultural values connected with this geographic region. A person does not even have to wear a complete set of traditional garments – just a few regional variations in style, such as a certain way to wear a scarf or a hat, would be enough to determine the origin of this specific individual. True, someone dressed in the Mexican poncho or the Japanese kimono might not necessarily come from those countries or be a follower of the respective cultures, but this should rather be treated as an exception to the otherwise universal rule.
With all that being said, I would still have to point out that regardless of how much we can learn from a person’s choice of clothes, I would not advise to use this information as a basis for our judgement of other people. For one, the same outfit can be worn by people with completely different personalities who had completely different reasons to choose it. For example, a shy person might try on a bolder, more defiant outfit as a defense mechanism to hide their inner personality issue. Just like this, a person wearing baggy clothes does not necessarily struggle with accepting their physical appearance, as would be commonly thought, but may just feel comfortable wearing it.
Furthermore, thanks to globalisation and, more specifically, Westernisation, there is progressively less diversity in clothes around the world. People now trade their traditional outfits for more fashionable and good-looking Western clothes such as jeans and T-shirts, so it becomes close to impossible to identify their origin by looking at what they have decided to wear. This situation is further exacerbated when celebrities, from musicians and singers to company CEOs and political leaders, conform to a uniform clothing standard, encouraging the masses to follow these styles. In this context, clothes have become just an outer shell separated from the actual nature of an individual, so it is outright wrong to judge a person based on their clothing habits.
In conclusion, there is no denying that clothes are, in a certain way, a reflection of a person’s background and personality. However, I believe that the picture of a person that can be painted with this information in mind is seriously incomplete, so we cannot rely on it to judge other people.
Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
MODEL ESSAY
Sherlock Holmes, arguably the most popular fictional detective, was able to identify a person’s true nature simply by watching them walk or hold a conversation. We ordinary folk are far from ever being able to emulate such feats, but something that is generally believed to be feasible is to learn a person’s background and personality based solely on their outfit. While I agree that a lot can be shown by the clothes that a person wears, I also think that this information is not sufficient to paint a complete picture of a person’s identity, and, therefore, we should not rely on it to judge others.
On the one hand, I can see why people believe that there is a connection between clothes and identity. One can argue that a person’s traits and values often manifest themselves in the colour and type of clothes that they tend to choose, which can be backed up by a vast amount of anecdotal evidence. We can safely assume that a shy person, who would want to shield themselves from a public eye, would choose more modest garments in pale colours so as not to attract any unnecessary attention. Meanwhile, bright colours and a more revealing outfit may suggest higher levels of confidence and willingness to engage in interactions with other people.
With the cultural background, the link becomes even more definite. Traditional clothes can help, with some acceptable degree of inaccuracy, indicate the country of origin and, more importantly, the cultural values connected with this geographic region. A person does not even have to wear a complete set of traditional garments – just a few regional variations in style, such as a certain way to wear a scarf or a hat, would be enough to determine the origin of this specific individual. True, someone dressed in the Mexican poncho or the Japanese kimono might not necessarily come from those countries or be a follower of the respective cultures, but this should rather be treated as an exception to the otherwise universal rule.
With all that being said, I would still have to point out that regardless of how much we can learn from a person’s choice of clothes, I would not advise to use this information as a basis for our judgement of other people. For one, the same outfit can be worn by people with completely different personalities who had completely different reasons to choose it. For example, a shy person might try on a bolder, more defiant outfit as a defense mechanism to hide their inner personality issue. Just like this, a person wearing baggy clothes does not necessarily struggle with accepting their physical appearance, as would be commonly thought, but may just feel comfortable wearing it.
Furthermore, thanks to globalisation and, more specifically, Westernisation, there is progressively less diversity in clothes around the world. People now trade their traditional outfits for more fashionable and good-looking Western clothes such as jeans and T-shirts, so it becomes close to impossible to identify their origin by looking at what they have decided to wear. This situation is further exacerbated when celebrities, from musicians and singers to company CEOs and political leaders, conform to a uniform clothing standard, encouraging the masses to follow these styles. In this context, clothes have become just an outer shell separated from the actual nature of an individual, so it is outright wrong to judge a person based on their clothing habits.
In conclusion, there is no denying that clothes are, in a certain way, a reflection of a person’s background and personality. However, I believe that the picture of a person that can be painted with this information in mind is seriously incomplete, so we cannot rely on it to judge other people.
(669 words)
BY IELTS with Farrukh | IELTS 9.0
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. The SC urges the public to refer to the SC’s I nvestor Alert List before investing. The list contains details of unauthorised websites, investment products, companies and individuals. Members of the public who suspect that they have been approached by unauthorised firms or individuals offering schemes that promise unrealistic returns "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from vn
