Белорусский форвард поучаствовал в единственной шайбе «Вашингтона», отдав результативную передачу на канадца Тома Уилсона. Его команда уступила «Бостону» – 1:3.
Также Протас три раза бросил по воротам, совершил один силовой прием и, проведя на площадке 19:17 минут, завершил встречу при показателе полезности «+1».
«Калгари» Егора Шаранговича по буллитам обыграл на выезде «Эдмонтон» (4:3 ПБ). Шарангович провел на льду 12 минут 47 секунд и не реализовал послематчевый бросок.
Белорусский форвард поучаствовал в единственной шайбе «Вашингтона», отдав результативную передачу на канадца Тома Уилсона. Его команда уступила «Бостону» – 1:3.
Также Протас три раза бросил по воротам, совершил один силовой прием и, проведя на площадке 19:17 минут, завершил встречу при показателе полезности «+1».
«Калгари» Егора Шаранговича по буллитам обыграл на выезде «Эдмонтон» (4:3 ПБ). Шарангович провел на льду 12 минут 47 секунд и не реализовал послематчевый бросок.
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried.
from vn
