Во всей этой поганой оглы-истории самое смешное это старательное, пронзительное, оглушительное молчание советского соловья Прилепина, профессионального жениха Шаргунова и прочих товарищей по Коммунистической идеологии, которым советский оглы объявил территориальные претензии на русские земли. Молчат коммунисты, включили ген осторожности, засунули языки в задницы глубоко-глубоко.
Ау, товарищи, какая ваша позиция по поводу вашего оглы???
Во всей этой поганой оглы-истории самое смешное это старательное, пронзительное, оглушительное молчание советского соловья Прилепина, профессионального жениха Шаргунова и прочих товарищей по Коммунистической идеологии, которым советский оглы объявил территориальные претензии на русские земли. Молчат коммунисты, включили ген осторожности, засунули языки в задницы глубоко-глубоко.
Ау, товарищи, какая ваша позиция по поводу вашего оглы???
Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from br
