⚡️Спасатели эвакуируют людей из забайкальского села, их участки затопило из-за ливней
15 участков в селе Маккавеево затопило из-за ливней. Уровень воды в реке Унгур резко вырос. В двух домах вода стоит в подпольях. Чтобы вода не пошла дальше, сотрудники МЧС делают отводные каналы.
Администрация предложила людям поселиться в пункте временного размещения, но эвакуированные жители решили пока переехать к родственникам.
⚡️Спасатели эвакуируют людей из забайкальского села, их участки затопило из-за ливней
15 участков в селе Маккавеево затопило из-за ливней. Уровень воды в реке Унгур резко вырос. В двух домах вода стоит в подпольях. Чтобы вода не пошла дальше, сотрудники МЧС делают отводные каналы.
Администрация предложила людям поселиться в пункте временного размещения, но эвакуированные жители решили пока переехать к родственникам.
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp.
from us
